Children\'s Morality Vs How Moral Are You

A Reaction Paper to: How good Are You? by Kohlberg, L. (1963); The teaching of childrens orientationof incorrupt thought & Telling The lawfulness by Barasch, Douglas S.(Family Life)\n\nI evince both of these articles and set in motion them to be interesting. In the first article, How lesson Are You? published in Forty Studies that changed Psychology IV by Roger R. Hock, what is discussed is Lawrence Kohlbergs look into on the formation of morality. Kohlberg believed the big business worldly concern to moralize situations encountered in life sentence develops in a peculiar(prenominal) pattern during our childhood long time. He believed that a child mustiness reach a authorized peak and work forcetality in order to create a level of morality. I found the information he presented was interesting. Things such(prenominal) as: each stage a child undergoes increases the sagaciousness of the concept of morality and the stages eternally occur in a step-by-step pattern.\n\nKoh lberg reasoned the stages argon prepotent, meaning the child under rejects any stage that he/she has been finished and a vague estimate of the stage above them (197). As for how he researched his surmisal, the process seems elemental enough. He supplied children of different ages with 10 hypothetical moral dilemmas(197). I found myself answering the questions just about moral issues with confusion. The question that was intimately difficult to answer was the Heinz plight in which a man commits a crime to turn in his wife from dying. I would liberate his [the husband] actions because the druggist was being dirty in his offering determine for his medicine. That kind of druggist shouldnt be allowed to be creating drugs in any in timethis job is to aid mass not the antithesis.\n\nI enjoyed breeding this article but conceived of a few flaws in his system that he [Kohlberg] did not quotation though many new(prenominal) critiques did. The glitches in his theory were such as: although Kohlberg represents an interpretation of morality, intimately of these ideas represent Western nuances and failed to apply to non-Western cultures. It was similarly difficult to apply his theory equally for both men and women. He did a wondrous job of explaining morality even though it would not stand up on its own in the years to come.\n\nThe second article I read, I found to be similar to my first in the fact that they both discussed moral reasoning of children and different so-called stages. It was published by Douglas S. Barasch in the 1998 February...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.