'Adults with Learning Difficulties Essay\r'

'â€Å"People with acquirement Difficulties argon unique individuals with their own likes and dislikes, hi reputation and opinions. They pose the same secures as e genuinelybody else” To begin my assignment I entrust be discussing the history of social extrusion in relation to commonwealth with l’earning difficulties/disabilities . I will then outline mould of well-disposed organize and in dissolveicular I will be focusing on discussion and how intervention has been used in relation to my chosen slip of paper study. In addition to this I will give in attention to a number of key issues in relation to decree’s views on lot with acquire Difficulties.\r\nI will also be discussing what Laws, Policies and approach patterns bring in been implemented to protect tidy sum with scholarship difficulties from conquest and discrimination and how effective these Laws collect rattling been in assisting people with Learning Difficulties to live the life q uantify they choose to live. During the late 19th century in particular, soci exclusivelyy excluding people with instruction disabilities was particularly inherent. At the time, those with ‘mental deficiencies’ were regarded as degenerates, and would often be unsaved for social problems such as crime and poerty.\r\nThis in turn led to the removal and institutionalisation of people persuasion to be ‘feeble minded’ and those referred to as ‘idiots’. animal Wolfensberger first published his thoughts about normalisation in 1972, through his starts ‘The principle of Normalization in human expediency’. Wolfensberger argued that many of the problems with the institutions arose from the way in which they were designed and run. The residents of these institutions were treated like numbers preferably than individuals, losing their identity and also their dignity.\r\nThey were often regarded as primitive, robustious and unable to be e ducated. The basic ideas and aims of the principles of normalisation puddle aimed to advocate club-based support for people with learning disabilities, whilst contemptible away from institutionalisation. But one of the most unmingled obstacles in achieving this has been the attitude of those in the ‘community’ towards people with learning disabilities. Up to this point kindly workers were clam up using the â€Å"tick box stage” when conducting minds and the medical examination position of f atomic number 18 was used which resulted in oppression of the returns user.\r\nIt was non until the NHS and community cargonfulness subprogram and the community treat (Direct Payments) Act was implemented in 1990’s that the attitudes towards people with Learning Difficulties began to improve on with the balance in power between amicable dish outers and Service Users. Further implementations of legal frameworks, policies and practices such as Valuing People 2001 and the Mental Capacity Act have helped to improve affectionate Work practice and in turn protect the rights of susceptible people whilst promoting Anti-Discriminator practice, affectionate intent valorisation and normalisation.\r\nToday’s touch of affable Work consists of five key stages. These are Assessment, decision making on outcomes, Planning, Intervention and Evaluation. Inter professional operative should be placed centrally throughout all stages of the social work process in rules of order to achieve the best possible outcome for the dish out user. Once the service users initial assessment has been carried out, decisions move then be made regarding the individuals overall inevitably and also their eligibility to receive funding for care mailboats and/or direct payments.\r\nIntervention can differ fit in to setting, moreover when expression at the intervention process for people with learning difficulties working in fusion and respecting the service user’s expertise is alert when putting agreed course of studys into action. This aspect of the intervention process can be linked to the exchange model as this approach agitates Anti Discriminatory Practice by empowering the service user to help adopt decisions about their future well cosmos.\r\nIt also meets the expectations of the service user that social workers are respecting their expertise. Milner and Obrien 2002) During the intervention process it is the concern of the care manager/social worker to examine that operate provided are meeting the traind standards and that the care is co-ordinated successfully to prevent deterioration due to gaps or lapses in care. It is also the responsibility of the care manager to ensure that services users are not excluded from services or receiving care that is of poor quality by evermore checking for discrimination stereotypes and assumptions made during the social work process.\r\nIt is at this point that the intervention process can be linked with the objectives of Social role Valorisation; the objectives be to prevent people from attaining negative social roles and to promote positive treasured roles in the first place. Work to reverse, or at least reduce the impact of existing negative roles and promote positive valued roles. The two key processes od social role valorisation are to enhance the social image of vulnerable people and to enhance their competencies.\r\nSocial workers are judge to monitor and review intervention lans on a regular basis. Because of this it is rattling that these plans can be changed at any time to suit the necessarily of the individual. When changes are made it is important that an other(prenominal) organisations involved are kept up to date with these changes to ensure that the plan remains co-ordinated and effective. Although this theory of intervention illustrates a soul centred approach, in that respect is evidence to suggest that people with le arning difficulties are still being failed by ordination due to standardisation and computerisation which can also be known as the â€Å"tick box format”.\r\nThere are also many instances where there is an incorrect assessment of finances during the initial assessment process, due to the focus on resources available rather than needs. This can lead to the service user being denied gate to services that they are entitled to. When looking at my case study Gemma, she has successfully been compound into society after(prenominal) a comprehensive process of assessment, planning and intervention has been completed to form a person centred care package that suits her needs as an individual with profound and multiple learning difficulties, but also as a young fair sex who is a human being.\r\nThe implementation of policies such as Valuing People 2001 and Valuing People Now promotes personalisation within society and has given people with Learning Disabilities like Gemma the righ t to their own independence, choice and inclusion. Also to have the pickaxe of appointing an advocate. However, I cannot help but feel that her story of success was down to the sheer determination of her mother, who had to iron for her daughters individual needs to be met.\r\nSocial Workers and other multi professionals who were involved in assessment of Gemma’s needs obviously felt that she would have benefited from institutionalisation, as it is verbalize that this was suggested as a future plan on numerous occasions. I cannot help but extol whether this has been due to professionals focusing on Gemma’s disability rather than focusing on her as a person. Valuing people 2001 states that the role of services is to help people no matter how complexed their disability, to live full and adapted lives in their local communities.\r\nAlthough the article states that ideas for Gemma to live as independently as possible were well sure and finally implemented, It is als o obvious that there have been constant struggles to obtain funding such as direct payments to accommodate Gemma’s visions to live a normal life within her community. Following Wolfensbergers victimization of Social Role Valorisation, Obrien developed the five service accomplishments, which provided a practical framework to work towards Social Role Valorisation.\r\nObrien suggests â€Å"Each accomplishment supports a vital dimension of human experience which common practice limits for people with severe Learning Disabilities. They challenge and fort the relationship between people with disabilities and other community members. (Obrien 1989) Recent articles published on the community care website have suggested that social workers themselves are witnessing the target-driven culture of bureaucracy within councils (just like Gemmas mum experienced ),and are aware that this has created numerous barriers to people with mental wellness problems gaining access to direct payments .\r\nIt has been reported that a Social Work Team Manager within Adults with Learning Disabilities actually left her role at Doncaster Council in 2010 because she had encountered these problems and felt that it hindered the intervention process. She has since started up her own Personalisation assembly Group to bring these service users together. The weekly meetings at a community centre now sop up 30 regulars, providing support and regular socialising opportunities. I utilise my social work skills to help the sort out solve the problems that they face; this involves reducing dependency on professionals by highlighting people’s strengths, and back up them to think through solutions on their own and with other group members. People describe feeling part of something, like they have some power over their own future and many for the first time can see something positive,” Hicks says.\r\nMichelle Lefevre, senior lecturer in social work at the University of Sussex, says i t is a â€Å" pitiable indictment” that Hicks felt she had to leave local endorsement social work to build such purposeful relationships with users. Not only is local government as well focused on administration rather than outlay time with children and families, she says, but problems in social work degree programmes and supervision mean practitioners are not equipped to deal with the emotional dimensions of the job.\r\nOverall it is very refreshing to read success stories like Gemma’s as it seems that she is living her live as independently as possible, whilst being supported by a dedicated team of people who are constantly ensuring that she is receiving person centred care and that her wishes remain central. It is my only promise that in the future it will not require a loving parent to fight the rights of a service user and to overcome hurdle after hurdle to receive the funding and care package they are rightful entitled to, but that the service user will be gra nted access to the services and funding they are eligible for with ease.\r\n'