Claim in relation to at least two ways of knowing

We detect and generalize things not as they atomic number 18 only when as we ar. Discuss this ask in relation to at to the lowest degree two expressive styles of knowing. Many things we chink and transform can be touch on by the confederation we live in, the beliefs we have, and our perceptions of the world. What I am going to try and do in this essay is discuss whether we watch things and project things not as they are, only if as we are. In this essay, I depart discuss several external factors which instill passel and, thus, interfere with of way of eyesight and discretion. in that location are several issues to be discussed which can affect the way homo beings take and empathise hings.There are sociologists, give care David mile Durkheim, who state that inn is independent over the soul. By facial expression this he wants to show us the force-out the society exerts on the singular. This may send to a change in perception, and the way the item- by-item will visualize and understand things. There are several shipway of knowing, on that point is a short end point P E A R L (Perception, Emotion, Reason, Language). Therefore, the society the individual lives on, the talking to he speaks, and cultural habits involving religion, will unquestionably affect the way the individual understand things.We discipline several issues in this ripe world which can prove my recital above. As rough of you may know, Israel and nirvana have been in skirmish for to a greater extent than than sensation century now. The individuals living in both societies, even though they are very close to each some early(a) (in terms of distance), the way they involve and understand things are very different, very removed away from each other. A individual raised internal Israel will in every last(predicate) probability have the aforementi one(a)d(prenominal) beliefs the others in the society do, and indeed would nurse the cause of Israe l against nirvana. As David mile Durkheim, famous French sociologist says, society is supreme over the individual.This comparable circumstance happening with the individual in Israel will desirewise happen, despite differently, with the individual in Palestine. This individual in Palestine will probably commit his divinity is Allah, and that the Israelis are intruders into their dominion. This clearly shows us that payable to their difference in cultural backgrounds, and beliefs, creates 2 very distinct ship canal of comprehend and understanding things, which in this case cease up in a conflict which have already resulted in the deaths of over 110 000 the great unwashed, which is the same umber of people living in Charleston (US).In this circumstance the distinct way of sightedness and understanding things have sufferd this war, however there are others situation where people try to understand the others way of understanding in harmony. It is also possible to have dif ferent ways of chinking and understanding things inside the same country. As we can see, in brazil nut there are over 67 tribes, in which they speak their give birth language, and fare their own rituals. It is certain that the vast majority of these Indians dont division the same beliefs as the people living in he elephantine cities (e. g. Rio de Janeiro).The Brazilian society as a whole accept these ditterences, and there is no contlict in between them, only in some separate cases dealing with territory utility, or other specific reason. There are even several sociologists, and some environmentalists which try understanding them, and their culture, and also protect their territory so that they can be enabled to continue with their normal lifes. However this kindred with the native Braszilian tribes has not always been like this, from 1500 to 1900 it is estipulated that over 200 000 natives ave been killed.In early long time there were little advance to ways of knowledge, a nd communication was very difficult. These could be one of the factors determining on this occupation. What I valued to show by using this Brazilian tribes example, was that the difference in ways of seeing and understanding things dont necessarily cause conflict. The natives share distinct perception from the world, they practice an exceedingly unique method which varies from tribe to tribe, and therefore they would see certain things we see as normal, with other eyes.For example when there is rain, ome tribes, like the Tupis, believe it is an attainer from god so that they can raise some more crops. Meanwhile and individual from the city would see it as a normal thing, as a natural element from the rush cycle. Culture and religion is cognise for distorting our visual perception. This is, seeing things not as they are, unless as we are. They affect directly on the formation of the individuals, and build them up in order to believe in their own way.Plato, a very famous philos opher, pupil of Socrates which was born in Greece, developed an eachegory, known as The Cave. Plato imagined individuals living in an immunity hollow out, with their legs and neck chained so that they could not move. Behind them was a fire, which would reflect them on the opposite wall of the sabotage. Puppet sourers would play with their puppets on front of the fire, so that the shadows created by it were reflected on the wall.The people passing finished the cave entrance talking would generate an echo which the individuals living on the cave would believe were coming from the shadows on the wall. Until one day, one prisoner is taken off the cave, and shown the real world, he hen realizes that all the things he believed were actually illusions, and werent unbowed. When the prisoner who was send free returned to the cave to tell the other about the truth, they didnt believed him, and killed him because they felt offended. Platos theory of the cave is a perfect example of in dividuals seeing things not as they are but as we are.It shows the impact of the society, which would blindly believe those shadows were true, and would refuse to open their mind, as if they were create by it. Now a day, there are different caves perhaps what we see as real, and would laim it is true, could be only an illusion. Therefore, as a conclusion we can see that by Joining up the triplet example given, we can say that the individual are extremely affected by the society they live on, the religious beliefs they have, and therefore the individual will not see things as they are but as they are.The formation of the individuals is extremely affected by these exteriors factors which will certainly distort their get wind of what is real and what isnt. As said before, all of us could be living inside a cave, and we don t has access to the real true. Due to that, the claim we see nd understand things not as they are but as we are could be said to be true even though many would go against it claiming that their beliefs are the right ones, similar situation to the prisoners on the cave.