Nussbaums Approach, the Capabilities Approach Essay

Nussbaums Approach, the Capabilities Approach - Essay Example Nussbaum’s Approach, the Capabilities Approach The society is sometimes affected by vices such as inequality and favoritism in attitude and behaviors based on sex stereotypes, ethnic, originality, economic and social status. This was despite the common knowledge that the practice is erroneous. It led to the making of biased actions and consequently denial of justice especially for the underprivileged citizens. Inequality degrades understanding in various societal aspects including interpersonal, of intra- and interactions among members of society and the established institutions. The discussions equality in the liberal theory made Nussbaum’s expression in her capability approach to equality. Moreover, civil liberties are crucial factors that determine citizen participation in the decision making process. Some political philosophers argue that a country requires a constructive platform for social democracy in order to achieve socioeconomic development. This calls for resolution of disputes amicably and minimal interferences in the dealings of other nations. Nussbaum’s approach, the capabilities approach, is designed to remedy serious flaws in Rawls’s theory of justice. While Nussbaum succeeds in addressing some areas of concern for Rawls, I will argue that ultimately, these changes are not enough and neither the capabilities approach nor justice as fairness can fully protect women’s human rights.... First is the principle of equal liberty that maintains that every individual has an equal right to the broad autonomy. This principle seeks to merge the ethics of equality, individual autonomy and obligations. It is regarded as a better ideal compared to harsh social equality since it gives a fairer opinion on what constitutes inequality-reflecting disparities in preference. The second principle is the difference principle that asserts that socioeconomic disparities should be planned so as to make it beneficial to less-privileged people while opening up equal opportunities for all. In the egalitarian ideals, liberties are allocated equally to all people. Additionally, he argued that it would be correct that each time societal structures persuade these ideals, victims oblige as long as they are free and fair. Individuals who have cognitive disabilities need to be treated equal and with respect like the normal human beings. It is important for the law provisions to guarantee such peopl e equal access to basic amenities such as health care, employment, education and housing. This cluster of people should have political and civil rights to express their opinion and participate in decision within the society. Martha Nussbaum gave an elaborate and overwhelming critique on the social convention and Rawl’s theory of justice (Alkire p. 32). She argued that social contract gave an inadequate insight of justice, particularly on people disabilities and non-citizens. Inclusion of this group in a theory of justice was an infringement of â€Å"premises of contractarianism†. The premises of contractarianism included; the treaty intended for the common benefit, some people were almost identical in powers and is largely egocentric in quest for their interests. She argued that disabled